Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5.0:1). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX
