Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5.0:1). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
