Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Shimano Catana 4000 RC
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag7kg / 15.43 lbs
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Catana 4000 RC and Shimano Cardiff 201A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Shimano Catana 4000 RC offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Cardiff 201A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Shimano Catana 4000 RC?
Shimano Catana 4000 RC
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- For 8.4 out of 10 (7kg / 15.43 lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
