Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180
Conclusion
Both Cormoran Sportline 2PiF and Shimano Cardiff 301A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, and durabilitymaximum drag. If you must choose between them, Cormoran Sportline 2PiF offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Cardiff 301A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Cormoran Sportline 2PiF?
Shimano Cardiff 301A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
