Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Daiwa 17 Prorex LT?
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX
