Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €204.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
