Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX
