Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:1) and total score (8.55 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
