Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Cardiff 301A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X
