Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and total score (8.44 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
