Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa TANASENSOR

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Daiwa TANASENSOR
Multireels
69.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/380
Conclusion
Daiwa TANASENSOR clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (4.3:1) and durability (8.63 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa TANASENSOR is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Daiwa TANASENSOR?
Shimano Cardiff 301A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Daiwa TANASENSOR
- A gear ratio of 4.3:1 (scoring 6.78 out of 10) gives you a nice middle ground, just enough torque to handle pressure, but still quick enough for general use
- At a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- A score of 6.29 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
