Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (5,5kg / 12,13lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn FIERCE IV 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5,5kg / 12,13lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X
