Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.5:1) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Penn Sargus II Spinning?
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.6 out of 10 (5.5:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X
