Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
51.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Catana FE 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.0:1) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Catana FE 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Catana FE 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Delphin INKS 5000X
