Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and total score (7.38 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano Cardiff 301A
- With a top weight score of 9.16 out of 10 (252g / 8.89oz), this reel keeps your setup light and responsive
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a serious drag score of 9.2 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Similar comparisons

Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
