Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Shimano FX
Spinning
49.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano FX 4000 FCX and Shimano Cardiff 301A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Shimano FX 4000 FCX offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Cardiff 301A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Shimano FX?
Shimano FX 4000 FCX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin FRIZ


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Delphin FRIZ vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tiagra 16X
