Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X and Shimano Cardiff 301A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and gear ratio. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Shimano Cardiff 301A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Cardiff 301A
- Solid value at €88.60, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of multireels fishing needs
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
