Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (6.64 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Shimano Cardiff 301A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX
