Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
