Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Spinning
63.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160 lb/yds: 6/200, 8/140, 10/120
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and line retrieve per crank (91cm / 35.83 inch). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI?
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
