Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.0:1) and line retrieve per crank (79cm / 31.10 inch). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI?
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6.61oz), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.29 out of 10 (79cm / 31.10 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX
