Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (9kg / 19.84 lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI?
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19.84 lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC
