Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.55 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight135g / 4.76oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.57 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 401A and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Cardiff 401A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX
