Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 401A and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
