Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 401A and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Shimano Cardiff 401A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
