Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
89.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.92 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 401A and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Shimano Cardiff 401A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
