Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 401A and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Cardiff 401A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX
