Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 401A and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Cardiff 401A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X
