Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €383.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and total score (8.86 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 401A and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Shimano Cardiff 401A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
