Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Shimano Catana 1000 RC
Spinning
47.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics4.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Shimano Catana 1000 RC and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, ergonomics and durability. If you must choose between them, Shimano Catana 1000 RC offers a slight edge in weight, while Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana 1000 RC and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano Catana 1000 RC
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9.52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX
