Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X

Shimano Catana 2500 RC, Spinning reel with rear drag
Shimano Catana 2500 RC
Spinning
49.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €33.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeRead drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750, QR 750, Spinning Angelrolle, Frontbremse, 10431-075
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €32.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeQR 750
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Conclusion

Both Shimano Catana 2500 RC and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Catana 2500 RC offers a slight edge in line retrieve per crank, while Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.

What's the difference between Shimano Catana 2500 RC and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?

Shimano Catana 2500 RC

  • When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles