Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana 2500 RC
Spinning
49.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Shimano Catana 2500 RC, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Shimano Catana 2500 RC may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana 2500 RC and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Catana 2500 RC
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Stradic FM vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
