Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX

Shimano Catana 2500 RC
Spinning
49.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX clearly outshines Shimano Catana 2500 RC, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.49 out of 10). While Shimano Catana 2500 RC may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana 2500 RC and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Shimano Catana 2500 RC
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
