Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX

Shimano Catana 3000 SRC
Spinning
49.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.2/220. 0.25/140, 0.3/100

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX clearly outshines Shimano Catana 3000 SRC, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (7.49 out of 10). While Shimano Catana 3000 SRC may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana 3000 SRC and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Catana 3000 SRC
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX
