Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana 3000 SRC
Spinning
49.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.2/220. 0.25/140, 0.3/100

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Shimano Catana 3000 SRC, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Shimano Catana 3000 SRC may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana 3000 SRC and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Catana 3000 SRC
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX
