Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI

Shimano Catana 3000 SRC, Spinning reel with rear drag
Shimano Catana 3000 SRC
Spinning
49.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €33.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000 S
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeRead drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.2/220. 0.25/140, 0.3/100
Shimano Sedona  2500 SFI, Spinning reel with front drag
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €52.80
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500 SFI
  • Handle typeHandle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m

Conclusion

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI clearly outshines Shimano Catana 3000 SRC, offering significantly better performance in ergonomics (6.18 out of 10) and ball bearings (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing). While Shimano Catana 3000 SRC may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Catana 3000 SRC and Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI?

There are not much differences between the two comparables