Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX
Shimano Catana 4000 RC
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag7kg / 15.43 lbs
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130
Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €421.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 MXGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/110
Conclusion
Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX clearly outshines Shimano Catana 4000 RC, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Catana 4000 RC may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana 4000 RC and Shimano Exsence?
Shimano Catana 4000 RC
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X
Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X
Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X
Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X
Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X