Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 1000 R and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
