Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 1000 R and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
