Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 1000 R and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
