Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa TANASENSOR
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90

Daiwa TANASENSOR
Multireels
69.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/380
Conclusion
Daiwa TANASENSOR clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.63 out of 10) and total score (6.97 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa TANASENSOR is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 1000 R and Daiwa TANASENSOR?
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa TANASENSOR
- At a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- A score of 6.29 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X
