Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (82cm / 32.28 inch) and maximum drag (4 kg). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 1000 R and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4 kg), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X
