Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.61 out of 10) and total score (7.58 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 1000 R and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X
