Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X and Shimano Sahara 1000 R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Shimano Sahara 1000 R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 1000 R and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Decent value at €46.33, it covers the basics, making it a great option for beginners or casual spinning setups
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX
