Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 160/0.16
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 1000 R and Shimano Stella FK?
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.1 out of 10 (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin HORNET 60X
