Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and total score (8.6 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 1000 R and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX
