Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (6.64 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 1000 R and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Delphin HORNET 40X
