Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 1000 R and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX
