Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.6 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.08 out of 10 (138g / 4,87oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX
