Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
56.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €169.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150
Conclusion
Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in weight (430g / 15,17oz) and ergonomics (5.79 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R and Daiwa BG MQ?
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX
- At 5.82 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- Scoring 8.77 out of 10 (430g / 15,17oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX
